Archive for the ‘2010’ Category

Jakub Teska, Generalized Hamiltonian Cycles

Tuesday, January 12th, 2010
Generalized Hamiltonian Cycles
Jakub Teska
Department of Mathematics, University of West Bohemia, Czech Republic
2010/1/28 Thu 4PM-5PM (E6-1 Room 2411 *1409*)

Hamiltonian cycle in a graph G is a cycle, which contains every vertex of the graph G. The problem of existence of a hamiltonian cycle in a graph is a well known NP-complete problem. While some theoretical necessary and sufficient conditions are known, to date, but no practical characterization of hamiltonian graphs has been found. There are several ways how to generalize the notion of a hamiltonian cycle.

For any integer r>1, an r-trestle is a 2-connected graph F with maximum degree ∆(F)≤ r. We say that a graph G has an r-trestle if G contains a spanning subgraph which is an r-trestle. This concept can be viewed as an interesting variation on the notion of Hamilton cycle. Another such variation is a concept of k-walks, where a k-walk in a graph G is a closed spanning walk visiting each vertex at most k times, where k is a positive integer.

We present several results and problems concerning mainly with k-walks and r-trestles and relations between them.

Daniel Král’, Total fractional colorings of graphs with large girth

Tuesday, January 12th, 2010
Total fractional colorings of graphs with large girth
Daniel Král’
ITI, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
2010/1/26 Tue, 4PM-5PM

A total coloring is a combination of a vertex coloring and an edge coloring of a graph: every vertex and every edge is assigned a color and any two adjacent/incident objects must receive distinct colors. One of the main open problems in the area of graph colorings is the Total Coloring Conjecture of Behzad and Vizing from the 1960’s asserting that every graph has a total coloring with at most D+2 colors where D is its maximum degree.

Fractional colorings are linear relaxation of ordinary colorings. In the setting of fractional total colorings, the Total Coloring Conjecture was proven by Kilakos and Reed. In the talk, we will present a proof of the following recent conjecture of Reed:

For every real ε>0 and integer D, there exists g such that every graph with maximum degree D and girth at least g has total fractional chromatic number at most D+1+ε.

For D=3 and D=4,6,8,10,…, we prove the conjecture in a stronger
form: there exists g such that every graph with maximum degree D and girth at least g has total fractional chromatic number equal to D+1.

Joint work with Tomás Kaiser, František Kardoš, Andrew King and Jean-Sébastien Sereni.

Jang Soo Kim (김장수), New Interpretations for Noncrossing Partitions of Classical Types

Monday, January 11th, 2010
New Interpretations for Noncrossing Partitions of Classical Types
Jang Soo Kim (김장수)
Laboratoire d’Informatique Algorithmique: Fondements et Applications (LIAFA), University of Paris 7, France
2010/1/21 Thu 4PM-5PM

The Catalan number \frac{1}{n+1}\binom{2n}{n} is perhaps the most frequently occurred number in combinatorics. Richard Stanley has collected more than 170 combinatorial objects counted by the Catalan number. Noncrossing partition, which has received great attention recently, is one of these, so called, Catalan objects. Noncrossing partitions are generalized to each finite Coxeter group. In this talk, we will interpret noncrossing partitions of type B in terms of noncrossing partitions of type A. As applications, we can prove interesting properties of noncrossing partitions of type B.

Daniel Král’, Algebraic versions of Removal Lemma

Monday, January 11th, 2010
Algebraic versions of Removal Lemma
Daniel Král’
ITI, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
2010/1/19 Tue, 4PM-5PM

We study algebraic analogues of the graph Removal Lemma. Vaguely speaking, the graph Removal Lemma says that if a given graph does not contain too many subgraphs of a given kind, then all the subgraphs of this kind can be destroyed by removing few edges. In 2005, Green conjectured the following analogue of it for systems of equations over integers:

For every k x m integral matrix A with rank k and every ε>0, there exists δ>0 such that the following holds for every N and every subset S of {1,…N}: if the number of solutions of A x = 0 with x ∈ Sm is at most δ N^{m-k}, then it is possible to destroy all solutions x ∈ Sm of A x = 0 by removing at most ε N elements from the set S.

We prove this conjecture by establishing its variant for not necessarily homogenous systems of equations over finite fields. The core of our proof is a reduction of the statement to the colored version of hypergraph Removal Lemma for (k+1)-uniform hypergraphs. Independently of us, Shapira obtained the same result using a reduction to the colored version of hypergraph Removal Lemma for O(m2)-uniform hypergraphs. The talk will be self-contained and no previous knowledge of the area related to the graph Removal Lemma will be assumed.

Joint work with Oriol Serra and Lluis Vena.