Zeta and L-functions have been classically associated, first to schemes of finite type over Z, and then to the l-adic cohomology of smooth projective varieties over a global field. In the latter definition, independence from l and actual existence remain partly conjectural in characteristic 0. In these lectures, I will explain how to associate unconditionally an L-function to objects in triangulated categories of motives. For the motive of a smooth projective variety this definition differs from the one above in general, but only up to a finite number of Euler factors. This might be useful to tackle the Beilinson conjectures.

Zeta and L-functions have been classically associated, first to schemes of finite type over Z, and then to the l-adic cohomology of smooth projective varieties over a global field. In the latter definition, independence from l and actual existence remain partly conjectural in characteristic 0. In these lectures, I will explain how to associate unconditionally an L-function to objects in triangulated categories of motives. For the motive of a smooth projective variety this definition differs from the one above in general, but only up to a finite number of Euler factors. This might be useful to tackle the Beilinson conjectures.

Zeta and L-functions have been classically associated, first to schemes of finite type over Z, and then to the l-adic cohomology of smooth projective varieties over a global field. In the latter definition, independence from l and actual existence remain partly conjectural in characteristic 0. In these lectures, I will explain how to associate unconditionally an L-function to objects in triangulated categories of motives. For the motive of a smooth projective variety this definition differs from the one above in general, but only up to a finite number of Euler factors. This might be useful to tackle the Beilinson conjectures.